Thanks Jeff. I think I'll dispense with the figures; they clearly aren't helping. I will add definitions, though. All the best. Tim.
On 2012-09-04, at 7:22 PM, "=JeffH" <jeff.hod...@kingsmountain.com> wrote: > > Colleagues - Here's a 00 I-D on trust models. > > > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-moses-webpki-trustmodel-00 > > > > Please take a moment to look it over and comment. I need your help to > > correct and complete it. > > > It appears to be a good start, thanks for writing it up. > > An overall +1 to AGL's comments. I think some definitions of terms would > also help, such as at least these.. > > Unaffiliated user > > Certificate User > > Policy Management Authority > > certificate-holder certificate > > ..though all the terms for "functions of the Web PKI" should probably be at > least briefly defined. > > Also, are figures 5 and 6 inter-related? on it's own I don't understand fig > 5, > and it almost seems fig 6 continues fig 5. > > In general, perhaps it'd help to describe in (much) more detailed prose what > fig 1 is attempting to represent. eg, I don't understand the overlapping > boxes, and don't know if you're referring to them in the last paragraph of > section 1, or referring to the "stacked" boxes of the underlying large box. > > > HTH, > > =JeffH > _______________________________________________ wpkops mailing list wpkops@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops
