On 9/16/13 5:23 PM, Tom Ritter wrote: > On 16 September 2013 17:10, Bruce Morton <bruce.mor...@entrust.com> wrote: >> Sounds reasonable. One question is that since it is not widely used, does it >> meet the 0.1 percent of connections criteria? I don’t know how we measure >> that. > > Chrome's between 16-46% of the market[0] and pins Google and > Twitter[1]. Between Google and Twitter, I'd say it probably hits > 0.1%...
is this behavior consistent with what mozilla was doing/did? https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744204 https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Features/CA_pinning_functionality > -tom > > [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_web_browsers#Summary_table > [1] > http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/net/http/transport_security_state_static.json > (And Tor, Cryptocat, and Tor2web). (It also preloads HSTS on ~200 > domains.) > _______________________________________________ > wpkops mailing list > wpkops@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops > _______________________________________________ wpkops mailing list wpkops@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops
