On 13/03/14 19:44, Tim Moses wrote: > Thanks Gerv. I'll make the revision. Actually, when I said "two", > my unit of measure was the "month", not the "IETF cycle".
Yes, indeed, I understood that. Sorry if my summary did not make it clear. I support the shorter timeline, FWIW. Gerv _______________________________________________ wpkops mailing list wpkops@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops
