In psychoanalytical terms, modern secularism is no release from the Oedipus complex, from which Freud said religion was derived; it is only the transfer of the projections originating ibn the Oedipus complex, from the world of spirits to the world of things. "The last figure in the series beginning with the parents is that dark supremacy of Fate," says Freud [Fate stood above the gods.], indicating the residudes of the parental complex in secular thought. It still remains true that religion is the middle term connecting psychoanalysis and society. If there is to be a psychoanalysis of money it must start from the hypothesis that the money complex has the essential structure of religion - or, if you will, the negation of religion, the demonic, which ~is~ like the role of the sphinx, a performance of paradox, or a "possession by possession" / a feedback circuit, an aegis of the absent waters. The psychoanalytical theory of money must start by establishing the proposition that money is, in Shakespeare's words, the "visible god"; in Luther's words, "the God of this world." But take pause in the subspace to discover the body lingering like a paranoia even in the names: Shakespeare.. Returning to Freud. Seminalismo / Perversion / Herm{eneutics and Luther like some transparent guitar or maker of guitarre, and back to Oedipus, to the lutes, the rounded and resonating pods, the horned section of string.. money, death, god, and psychoanalysis, music, or poetry, Art, already like dancing like demons in a stew trading names, registers, meanings, like the water changes limbs, like the limbs changing the waters, sacred, irrational shadows falling across the face of some specific absolutes..