snout dinner nurtured
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 21:05:32 -0700 "P!^VP 0!Z!^VP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > snot in my naychur. > > [reaching for Ana] > > At 20:58 on 3/31/07 in 730 bytes > Divizio wrote: > snot in my naychur ~ > unguent jam hi tamp > unguent jam ml tine > Wyuom jam ni Gone > > D^ > > > > > > On 31-Mar-07, at 8:32 PM, Tom_ Lewis wrote: > > > > > in post-molested, pre-chewed, perfecly modern text? > > > > SD: every syllable's labored and every labcoat labelled, > > "your code is mine, mavenly remonstrator" -- > > > > I was fuckin on your side, Deuteronomy. > > > > so slit me a god that has no split hooves, > > and tell him it wasn't anything personal. > > > > and anyway this is officially my word, my carte blanche: > > you are allowed to dismantle anything I write and call it your'n, > > > > or flush it down, or claim that I wrote it -- > > the best piece I ever did > > > > I threw out a window in the city > > and let the cars drive over it. > > > > now, take offense at that, why dontcha? > > > > tl > > > > > > On Friday, March 30, 2007, at 01:11PM, steve d. dalachinsky > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>>> Youth smights conned sider red moving theme pipeline > >>> > >>> movement then maligns remedy love these fine/lined > >>> forms good snakes never yonder moved then linen > >>> > >>> glory gonads strayed spilly, atttired, pre con instructing > >>> > >>> knot slin guise stick Dumb Numb Acoustic travail able to > predudice > >> gister > >>> may pot sticc. may cod fish ours, heave lonely maker > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Friday, March 30, 2007, at 12:03PM, "steve d. dalachinsky" > >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>> sorry i sit there at machine answer emails and in betweeen > either > >>> push > >>>> foward or reply to one of yours or someone else's texts then > wthout > >>> the > >>>> aid of anythi > > ng but the 2 fingers and silly tired brain > >>> reconstruct > >>>> pieces of others as soon as possible no real genius or anything > >>>> even too dumb to be aware of what yer form is but then i send > em > >>> off and > >>>> most times forget to say i redid em my error > >>>> or sometimes just put sd like AT THE BOTTTOM OF THIS this is > >>> SORRY > >>>> all unintentionional again my fau pau > >>>> > >>>> sd > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 20:32:40 -0700 "rzep" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> writes: > >>>>> hey steve - just a note from me to say that i really DID > >>> appreciate > >>>>> this > >>>>> form - genius in fact what you're doing - and it was this > very > >>>>> subtlety that > >>>>> blurs even more the authorship whatever - the whole point of > >>> doing a > >>>>> > >>>>> response/collaboration, no??? > >>>>> > >>>>> cheers! > >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- > >>>>> From: "P!^VP 0!Z!^VP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>> To: <WRYTING-L@LISTSERV.WVU.EDU> > >>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 6:25 PM > >>>>> Subject: Re: Fatima airhead ~ > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> Steve, > >>>>>> Though I appreciate your reading and deconstructing my posts > I > >>> am > >>>>> going > >>>>>> to here take issue with the way you present your > adjustments, > >>>>>> as misleading. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Though you got the right Subject line, I did not write: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 02:56:53 -0700 "P!^VP 0!Z!^VP" > >>>>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>>>>>>> Fat i may fair ahead ~ > >>>>>>>> bone fried oval air > >>>>>>>> be ear berry don id sir 8ths > >>>>>>>> bistro covers stone > >>>>>>>> bo is stereo can't idiot > >>>>>>>> bloating ominous > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Do what ever you want of course, but I request you please > make > >>> > >>>>> your > >>>>>> adjustments to my initial presentation appear to be your > >>>>> adjustments. > >>>>>> As you present them it appears I wrote what is above here. > I > >>> did > >>>>> not. > >>>>>> You don't show my original and so, I think you're confusing > >>> what > >>>>> is > >>>>>> already quite a difficult poetic. Congratulations. > >>>>>> What I post has maintained a certain form these last 9 years > >>> and > >>>>> so the > >>>>>> "form" is apparently important to me. > >>>>>> You might consider removing the line > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> > >>>>> writes: > >>>>>> Thanks. > >>>>>> P!^VP > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 29-Mar-07, at 2:55 PM, steve d. dalachinsky wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 02:56:53 -0700 "P!^VP 0!Z!^VP" > >>>>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>>>>>>> Fat i may fair ahead ~ > >>>>>>>> bone fried oval air > >>>>>>>> be ear berry don id sir 8ths > >>>>>>>> bistro covers stone > >>>>>>>> bo is stereo can't idiot > >>>>>>>> bloating ominous > >>>>>>>> sd > >>>>>>>> 2:40 3/29/07 752 bytes > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> This engaged and composed on the heels of having posted > the > >>> Open > >>>>> the > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Airways bit... PLEASE! > >>>>>>>> I only saw one Dr, not 8, and oni is devil in Japanese and > >>> yes, > >>>>>>>> there > >>>>>>>> may be... boisterous overtones the antidote. > >>>>>>>> BRING THEM HOME! > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> P!^VP > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > P!^VP >
