In that case, <strong> and <em> would also miss out. I believe that there is a need for a content separator in the structure of information and I can't think of a better one than <hr>. Otherwise you would need to create non-semantic equivalents to separate concepts in a document.
P > -----Original Message----- > From: Cameron Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 2:09 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [WSG] styling hr tags > > > I can never understand why <hr> tags made it into the > XHTML spec, as they are pretty much presentation-only, > not structure. > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes > http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus > ***************************************************** > The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > ***************************************************** > ***************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ *****************************************************
