"rejections" or "reservations" ? If it's the latter, then any of the various
"Making a business case for accessibility" type articles, extolling the benefits
of CSS, plus a reminder that the majority of today's browsers can cope with CSS
layouts just fine (except, of course, the boss' wife's Netscape 4.7, and she is often
the benchmark).
If it's outright rejection...remember that the boss/client is always right. You
can't force good things onto them, and in many cases - depending on the audience -
a nice hybrid/transitional layout is just fine - and, provided it's valid xhtml, can
still
be mechanically "un-tabled" at a later date.
Patrick
________________________________
Patrick H. Lauke
Webmaster / University of Salford
http://www.salford.ac.uk <http://www.salford.ac.uk>
-----Original Message-----
From: Jaime Wong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat 13/03/2004 23:16
To: WSG - CSS List
Cc:
Subject: [WSG] Overcoming Rejections
What will be the most appropriate way to overcome rejections from clients or
bosses when it comes to implementation of site with CSS instead of tables.
Rejection such as browser compatibility saying that no worries about that
when using tables for layout even when explanations have been given.
With Regards
Jaime Wong
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SODesires Design Team
http://www.sodesires.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
*****************************************************
áyØrë,Š‰åŠË_¢¸m¶ŸÿÁæìÝj·l‚º.¦Šà
