> The source of the old post is, > Tim [deleted] > Yeah that was Tim's message that was resent. He is definitely not the problem.
> Check the header of the post previous to the repeat of Russ's post. Yep, it's Russ' address > > I wouldn't rule out the possibility that this is the work of > a spammer > looking for a way to access the list. You may be right. Received: from i2kc04-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net ([217.32.164.183]) by i2kc04-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); The 217... Address is in the UK but a trace is not going right through. BT have been notified. If I hear nothing from anyone that may be causing it in the next 24 hours I'll have to block the BT smtp server smtp4.smtp.bt.com [217.32.164.151]. If you recognise any of the servers mentioned please talk to me directly asap. Thanks for trying to help Rob but better to do this off list to [EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than point the finger publicly. Regards, Peter ***************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ *****************************************************
