> Who would be completely happy with the "Standards" set in 1992? > Didn't the late nineties "Browser wars" come up with > non-standard stuff that's now included in the standard.
Yes, but: before becoming part of the standard, most of these innovations were extended, expanded, generalised and made consistent with the way existing standards worked. Not every single proprietary extension made its way into the standard. Every extension was scrutinised by a larger group without - ideally - a vested interested in breaking any existing standard. Then again, according to the "article" (rant): changing standards = OXYMORON ;) P ________________________________ Patrick H. Lauke Webmaster / University of Salford http://www.salford.ac.uk ***************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help *****************************************************
