I agree Patrick, considering there is no proper Active X support on FF1.0PR which means XStandards wouldn't run unless it on the older version. Although they(XStandards) are working on a new verion due in a couple of weeks time which wouldn't need any active X at all.
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 15:10:17 +0100, Patrick Lauke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A bit off topic perhaps, but: > > I'd suggest always starting with a fresh profile when installing > a new version of FF. Export your bookmarks, make a note of any > passwords etc you may have, write down which extensions you > absolutely need...then download the new version, start it from > the command line with firefox.exe -p to force the profile manager, > and set up a new virgin profile. > > What I did when FF1.0PR came out was to keep 0.9 still installed, > to use it in the interim period while extensions were being repackaged > and updated to work with 1.0PR. I simply had two shortcuts on my > desktop, and changed the actual target of the shortcut to load the > relevant executable plus selecting the right profile, e.g. > > "C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox 1.0PR\firefox.exe" -profile "C:\Browser > Profiles\Firefox 1.0PR" > > and > > "C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox 0.9\firefox.exe" -profile "C:\Browser > Profiles\Firefox 0.9" > > Now that 1.0PR has all the extensions I need, and seems to run fairly stable, > I deleted FF 0.9 and the related profile. > > Saves a lot of hassle in the long run...IMHO anyway. > > Patrick > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chris Rizzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 17 September 2004 14:46 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [WSG] Moz vs. FF > > > > > > > > Reinstalling Web Dev after installing 1.0 PR worked for me > > too. I found this > > true of a handful of extensions. Most of the more popular > > extensions seemed > > to still work. Try running the extension updates again after > > the install. > > > > Chris > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of Dan Webb > > Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 9:31 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [WSG] Moz vs. FF > > > > It tells you that but it lies. Ive got it working on 1.0PR by just > > reinstalling > > it after installing 1.0PR. > > > > Quoting Tom Livingston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > Current version of Web Dev extention is incompatible with > > FF 1.0PR... > > > > > > > > > Tom Livingston > > > Senior Multimedia Artist > > > mlinc.com > > > > > > Get FireFox > > http://spreadfirefox.com/community/?q=affiliates&id=0&t=1 > > > > > > > > ****************************************************** > The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > > Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/ > Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge > To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004 > > See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > for some hints on posting to the list & getting help > ****************************************************** > > > > ****************************************************** > The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > > Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/ > Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge > To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004 > > See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > for some hints on posting to the list & getting help > ****************************************************** > > -- Regards, Amit Karmakar http://www.karmakars.com ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/ Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
