On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:13:16 -0000, Phil Baines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Clean code, except for two silly things I checked in Teifi's site: <a > > name="content" class="skipTo"> </a> The attribute name should be > > replaced by id, and the link may have some content to keep in logical > > for screen readers and css-less people. And by using an id, you can > > also kill the class. > > This is meant to be an Anchor for the 'Skip to content' links earlier on in > the code. As far as my knowledge leads me to believe, and ID attribute will > not work in place of the NAME attribute for an Anchor (or at least it wont > for older browsers). Also, according to this - > http://www.blooberry.com/indexdot/html/tagpages/a/a-bookmark.htm - Either > the HREF or NAME MUST be present in an Anchor tag.
According to this HTML 4.0 spec (http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-html40-19980424/struct/links.html), ID is allowed on anchors as well for the same purpose. Also, the DTD tells me ID has replaced the HTML NAME in XHTML (http://66.102.9.104/custom?q=cache:v8_T7ASDsDQJ:www.w3.org/People/mimasa/test/schemas/xhtml-basic10-f2.xsd.txt+name+id+anchor+xhtml+1&hl=en&ie=UTF-8). Hey, I'm just a n00b. -- Cheers, Rob. » http://zooibaai.nl ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************