browsercam http://www.browsercam.com/default.aspx pretty cheap and quick if you don't have a friend with a mac.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of ROBYN BALL Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 10:46 AM To: wsg Subject: [WSG] IE View Hi list, Is there a program or browser extension you recommend that I can use to see what my pages will look like on IE on Mac. (I use Firefox generally) Or is the best test to find someone with a mac to send screen shots? Regards, Robyn -----Original Message----- From: info Sent: Tuesday, 7 December 2004 10:40 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: [WSG] Semantic Breadcrumbs With all due respect, and this is nothing personal guys, can this type of discussion be kept off list please? It serves no purpose trying to publicly prove your point and it's a bit negative. emails like this really should be sent directly to eachother and are not really helpful to list members. all the best, Lisa -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Futter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 8:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WSG] Semantic Breadcrumbs On 6/12/04 9:31 PM, "Mordechai Peller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Time to call a truce? >> > I am unwilling to change my view as I've seen no reason to do so; in > fact, I believe even more strongly now in what I'm saying that I did > when this discussion began. If you want to leave it at that, I won't > object (not that an objection would be worth much, anyway). > OK, time to wrap this up methinks, as you seem to be getting a little testy here Mordechai (and I'm sure this issue's had more than enough air time now). By calling a truce I'm not asking you to change your mind, nor has that been my goal throughout this discussion. I need to state this plainly I think: I'm not against the use of lists for breadcrumbs, I think they're fine; I do however take issue with the notion that they are the only semantically valid approach. I too don't see any reason to change my views on this, which renders further discussion/debate kinda pointless. I respect your views on this issue Mordechai and you argue them well, and I apologise if I've antagonised you in any way, but at the end of the day it's better to 'agree to disagree' and move on to more fruitful discussions. -- Kevin Futter Webmaster, St. Bernard's College http://www.sbc.melb.catholic.edu.au/ ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ****************************************************** ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ****************************************************** ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ****************************************************** ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
