Re: [WSG] images and the dl

[Mordechai Peller]

Ted Drake wrote:
As for the image being a definition term,...why wouldn't it be semantic?
I don't know the W3C codes by heart, so I could easily be missing an important part of the puzzle and would be interested in seeing what I am missing.
 

<dl>
<dd><img></dd>
<dt>Name</dt>
<dd>Title</dd>
<dd>Ext</dd>
</dl>
   

Whether the image should be a term or data is open for debate. While I 
tend to favor having them as data, there is also a good case for as a 
term. This, however, isn't the source of my contention. In a dl the dd's 
must follow their associated dt, not precede them.

Andy Clarke has an interesting post on creating an e-commerce site with 
definition lists.
I skimmed it and it looks interesting. Thanks.
I don't remember the use of the position relative.
Been there; done that. Having artifacts in my CSS has caused me more 
than one headache.
******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************