> Parker Torrence > It was my understanding that the subject of this thread was fonts in > front of background images. Therefore by logic any talk about images > within the context of this thread whould be implied to be about said > background images.
Not necessarily. As Andreas was referring to buttons (implying clickable foreground element), his "I'll have to go with images" (couple with the "I'll have to use javascript for rollovers) would suggest that, instead of having background image and foreground text, he'd use a foreground image element (unless he was suggesting the rather disingenious idea of having something like an empty link, forcibly styled to a certain width/height, with the background image via CSS). > I thought you ment your post to be on topic Anyway... Patrick ________________________________ Patrick H. Lauke Webmaster / University of Salford http://www.salford.ac.uk ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
