On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 10:10 +0100, Patrick Lauke wrote: > I think that this (particularly the "legal document" case) is a > scenario in which we have to recognise that there *is* no widely supported > semantic equivalent.
I'd agree with this statement, however, in terms of structuring your content in a form that is reusable, it may be a wise idea to develop your own XML schema and structure the content in this, and then use either client- or server-side XSL. This way, even if it's not semantically ideal now, the possibility of altering the markup to a more appealing form when technology supports this becomes a (relatively) trivial task. Just a thought... Kind Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com.au/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021 Mobile: 0425 808 469 Multimedia Development Agency ________________________________________________________________________ E-mails and any attachments sent from base10solutions are to be regarded as confidential. Please do not distribute or publish any of the contents of this e-mail without the sender’s consent. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to the e-mail, and then delete the message without making copies or using it in any way. Although base10solutions takes precautions to ensure that e-mail sent from our accounts are free of viruses, we encourage recipients to undertake their own virus scan on each e-mail before opening, as base10solutions accepts no responsibility for loss or damage caused by the contents of this e-mail. ________________________________________________________________________ ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
