Acording to the WHAT-WG the <small> element does have semantic meaning. I don't have the link though. They basically said that it was good for things like 'small print' and such cases. I think <small> is an unusal case here and is meanigful and useful.
Alan Trick Matt Thommes wrote: > Is there any reason at all to ever use <small>, and <big>? > > I know they are "visual" elements, but I thought I heard somewhere > that <small> represents a tonal adjustment, for screen readers - such > as *lowering* the tone of voice. > > <em> and <strong> provide levels of emphasis - but is there an > opposite to that? The other end of the spectrum, I mean? > > > MATTHOM > matthom.com/ ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
