Hi Roberto,

I think this may answer many of your questions:
http://www.w3.org/International/tutorials/tutorial-char-enc/

RI


============
Richard Ishida
W3C

contact info:
http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/ 

W3C Internationalization:
http://www.w3.org/International/ 

Publication blog:
http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/
 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roberto Gorjão
> Sent: 15 June 2005 10:27
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: [WSG] Encoding, charsets and entities...
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I’m trying to understand the pros and cons of different 
> charset encodings and I would like to know what your 
> experience tells you about this subject, notably:
> 
>     * Unicode encoding (UTF-8) seems to be more efficient than ISO
>       charsets (iso-8859-1): It covers all the languages in a single
>       encoding; it’s universal (or at least getting to be); it’s
>       compatible with ASCII; some argue even that it’s quicker… Are
>       there any drawbacks? Does the fact that the characters 
> Unicode may
>       have different sizes affect string calculus with JavaScript?
>       String lengths, character position retrieval and so on?
>     * Where does the use of UTF leaves us regarding to entities? Some
>       say that we don’t have to worry anymore with coding currency
>       symbols or accented letters… Is that true? (I really 
> did never pay
>       much attention to this matter and get used to see 
> Dreamweaver code
>       automatically all accented letters that I insert in the 
> design tab
>       (that’s almost the only reason why I use the design tab 
> nowadays…)
>       but I think I would convert myself definitely to a much cheaper
>       software if even this functionality turns out to be 
> useless). And
>       what about quotation marks and less than and greater than signs?
>       They seem to validate all right when inserted directly 
> on the code
>       without any kind of special entities coding.
>     * Which is the best way to declare it? I’ve noticed that
>       webstandardsgroup.org page declares it only in the XML “prolog”
>       and does not use any meta tag to do it as does for instance the
>       Unicode.org page.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Roberto
> 
> ******************************************************
> The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
> 
>  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
>  for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
> ******************************************************
> 

******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************

Reply via email to