On 4/7/05 2:42 PM, "russ - maxdesign" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hope could just have easily changed from an incomplete HTML4.01 Transitional > doctype to a complete version. This is not a criticism of Hope, as she may > have had other reasons for moving to XHML. This was not a conscience nor educated decision. As a newbie to css and web standards, I have been learning by using resources such as this helpful list, various books (as recommended on this list), and templates offered on the web. The main template I've been using is derived from Owen Briggs' generic text styles template found at: http://www.thenoodleincident.com/tutorials/typography/ and http://www.thenoodleincident.com/tutorials/typography/template.html It is from this template that I picked up <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en"> I would be very interested to know the pros & cons of using this! Regards, Hope ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
