That's the problem with the internet, outdated information is not so
obvious. I guess I should've looked closer.

As an aside, I tested the lh tag and it works in a page that is html mud. I
haven't tried it in a valid page. I was also able to get the css to apply
styles to it.

Ted

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Joseph Lindsay
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 12:29 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] more definition list lovin' - the lh tag.

Upon further research, it appears that the <lh> element was in older
HTML specs.  I found it in the HTML 3 DTD.  but it is not in more
recent versions.

http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/html3/html3.dtd

On 7/7/05, Joseph Lindsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ted, can you give me the URL where you found that?  As far as I can
> tell from the HTML 4.01 DTD (i'm happy to me corrected) the <dl>
> element must contain 1 or mor <dt> or<dd> elements, and can't contain
> any other elements (although the <dt> can have inline elements and
> <dd> can have block and inline elements).  I can't find any reference
> to a <lh> element in the current specs.
> 
> 
> On 7/7/05, Drake, Ted C. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just when I thought I couldn't love the definition list any more, I
looked
> > at the w3.org definition of the definition list and came across this:
> >
> > The opening list tag must be <DL>. It is followed by an optional list
header
> > (<LH>caption</LH>) and then by term names (<DT>) and definitions (<DD>).
For
> > example:
> >
> > <DL>
> > <LH>List Header</LH>
> > <DT>Term 1<dd>This is the definition of the first term.
> > <DT>Term 2<dd>This is the definition of the second term.
> > </DL>
> >
> > which could be rendered as:
> > List Header
> >
> > Term 1
> >     This is the definition of the first term.
> > Term 2
> >     This is the definition of the second term.
> >
> >
> > Holey headers, batman! We can put a list header on our definition list?
How
> > cool is that?!?
> >
> > Has anyone seen a site that uses this?
> >
> > Andy Clarke uses the definition lists in forms,
> >
http://www.stuffandnonsense.co.uk/archives/e-commerce_definition_lists.html
> > . This would be a great way to markup a set of radio buttons and use the
> > header to define the group of buttons.
> >
> > One of these days, I'm just gonna have to sit down and read the entire
> > specs.
> >
> > Ted
> > www.tdrake.net
> > ******************************************************
> > The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
> >
> >  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> >  for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
> > ******************************************************
> >
> >
>
******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************

Reply via email to