Web page designed by clueless person. Film at 11. Personally I think both designs have issues. The font size is too small on the first one, and in the second one its a good size but it overflows eveywhere. And don't go in to the code behind it all.
Kids these days :P Felix Miata wrote: > Soren Johannessen wrote: > > >>Next week bibliotek.dk [Denmark] (url http://bibliotek.dk) is going to >>redesign their website >>"In bibliotek.dk you will find records of all items published in Denmark >>as well as all items found in the Danish public & research libraries." >> >>There is a beta version ready http://proto.bibliotek.dk/ - This was a >>chock/surprice to see such a bad redesign in 2005 from a web standards >>point of view. I am going to write a review article (sorry this article >>is going to be in Danish) what's wrong with this new redesign.My major >>findings and what is wrong is [...] > > > You're right about having a lot wrong. This shows just a few problems > (it is worse farther down, or when zoomed): > http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/SS/soren1.png > > The text is too small, and it often doesn't fit into the spaces allotted > for it. The text is (too small) via relative sizing, but the space for > it to fit is frequently set with px for container height or line-height, > and overflow: hidden to go with it. The result is a lot of hidden or > overlapping text when the user's browser is using uncommon settings. ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
