RE: [WSG] Page Check: www.qm-consulting.co.uk/test/indextest

[Ryan Blunden]

Hi Richard,   Your content is indeed usable, accessible, semantic and valid, but if I was a potential client of yours, I wouldn't be saying, 'Wow, that site looks great, I hope my site will look like that'. I'm not trying to put you down, I'm simply giving you my honest opinion.   Now maybe I'm completely out of touch and maybe all our sites should look like Jacob Neilson's but from my experience, sites need to be aesthetically pleasing as well as accessible and CSS and DOM scripting gives us more than enough power to do both. Perhaps you could sit down with a graphic designer to work more visual elements into your site and improve the overall look and feel? I think it would be worthwhile.   Also, what is the business case for needing the W3C badges, really?   Best Regards, Ryan From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of QM Consulting Ltd Sent: Saturday, 5 November 2005 2:42 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] Page Check: www.qm-consulting.co.uk/test/indextest I have been following this list with interest for some time and I am currently working on creating my web site. I've done some testing on IE and Firefox and validated on w3. I would appreciate any feedback, regarding standards, semantics, usability, accessibility etc.   The page is at http://www.qm-consulting.co.uk/test/indextest.html   Thanks,   Richard Morton         __________ NOD32 1.1275 (20051103) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 Antivirus System. http://www.nod32.com