Jonathan O'Donnell said: > ** The solution ** > Wild metadata, such as anchor text, blog descriptions and folksonomies > may provide better description and subject (or keyword) metadata. > The quality will not be as good as trained librarians applying metadata > via a standardised system and controlled vocabularies. It will, > however, be as good or better than untrained people applying metadata > to their own pages. It will also be better than no metadata at all.
You're such a pirate Jonathon =) I love it. The Web 2.0 fans should too. Now all you need to do is package this up as a web service and you've got yourself a web 2.0 company =) kind regards Terrence Wood. ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
