Thx much. I will revert back to that strategy. 'Preciate the support.

ma

On 11/28/05, Samuel Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mark,

Well, if they insist on a spanning image then I'd find four or five of
the images they like then turn joing them together and turn it into a
tiling background image, that way no matter how wide the page gets their
will always be images in the header, then you can fix the logo in the
top left and just have the repeating images run underneath it.

Samuel


Mark Arnold wrote:

> Samuel,
>
> I am much obliged. Everything you hit on has been  nagging at me ( i.e.
> on the logo I am using width and height with percentages, hoping for
> the logo to span the page as requested by the site owner. But this
> results in a pixelized img. Any further suggestion here?). I will
> incorporate your suggestions but thx much for giving the site the once
> over.
>
> Mark
>
> On 11/28/05, *Samuel Richardson* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Mark,
>
>     First of all it looks like you are resizing your images using the
>     width
>     and height attributes on the img tag. If those dimensions do not match
>     the ones on the image then your images wind up being pixelated (like
>     they are on the logo).
>
>     A quick scan of your code, replace your <b> tags with <strong>, change
>     your <br> tags like <br /> to close them, same with the image tags
>     <img
>     src="" becomes <img src="" />
>
>     Get rid of any align attributes. You also need to specifiy a doctype
>     etc, that's why the page won't be getting anywhere if your checking it
>     in the W3C validator.
>
>     From a design point of view, bring the font size in the left hand
>     column navigation up a bit, it should be quite important, I'd also
>     make
>     that nav column match the width of the logo, bring the headers "gifts
>     for the holidays" and "tea talks" up to match the top of the
>     navigation
>     box, if you do those three things it will square the page up a bit
>     more
>     and make it look more attractive.
>
>     Samuel
>     www.geminidevelopment.com.au < http://www.geminidevelopment.com.au>
>
>
>     Mark Arnold wrote:
>
>     > All,
>     >
>     > I have been lurking in the group for some time and have been humbled
>     > by the
>     > collective wisdom present here. I am hobbyist (security
>     > network/academic type by trade)
>     > trying to get up to speed on webstandards to help redesign a few
>     > non-profit orgs that I am associated with.
>     >
>     > Actually the site I need input on is not so much a non-profit but a
>     > small business that my future mother-in-law runs.
>     > here is the address of the old site:
>     >
>     > http://teagarden.biz/index.htm
>     >
>     > The current redesign and css file:
>     >
>     > http://teagarden.biz/newindex.htm
>     > http://teagarden.biz/teagard3.css
>     >
>     > I'm having a lot of problems with margins and incorporating other
>     > dimensional concepts into the site.
>     > I welcome all comments. Thx
>     >
>     > --
>     > Chrs,
>     > Mark
>     >
>     > 617-259-6124 (m)
>     > 617-249-1539 fax
>
>     ******************************************************
>     The discussion list for   http://webstandardsgroup.org/
>
>     See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
>     for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
>     ******************************************************
>
>
>
>
> --
> Chrs,
> Mark
>
> 617-259-6124 (m)
> 617-249-1539 fax

******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************




--
Chrs,
Mark

617-259-6124 (m)
617-249-1539 fax

Reply via email to