Hi John,

>Many standards websites have subtle gradients in backgrounds -- is this 
>because designers are confident in using PNG files which do gradients better 
>for smaller file sizes?

My opinion is that gradients and textures are introduced to recreate the 
textures of real world surfaces not otherwise available to a projected light 
display. As an example, A List Apart's new design [1] harks back to Victorian 
woodcut typographic elements which lends the page 'warmth'.

>So, is the technology dictating the look, or are all these things just 
>accidents of history because some major relaunch like the 
>stopdesign/AdaptivePath redesign of Blogger looked that way?

Perhaps an awareness of standards (as suggested by Russ in his expanded web 
standards checklist [2]) begets an awareness of accessibility and the impact of 
presentation on accessibility (read text-legibility in this instance). If this 
is the case, then form is likely to follow function. Type *not* set at 9 
pixels, less incidence of type-as-image and establishing a 'style guide' (focus 
on content) rather than 'poster' (focus on image) suggest that the designer is 
more aware of end-use. When seen on mass it is likely that similar 'solutions' 
will be found to the same design 'problems'.

As noted by Ted, the pioneers in the field of web standards have set a visual 
tone that those new to the field may either learn from or aspire to recreate. 
In particular blogs have rapidly changed the overall tone of the web both at a 
visual and functional level. In some ways the default templates for blogging 
software have set an expectation that webpages should be fixed-width and 
centered to the screen (not an opinion that I share). For a non-web equivalent 
some clients now believe that a logo is only a logo when it:
-has a shadow
-is 3D
-or is inset or embossed

If a 'web standard look' is the look that is associated with the websites that 
are relevant (i.e. contemporary/topical) then design agencies may 'borrow' this 
aesthetic to be seen as contemporary.

The 'web standards look' also has much in common with the new interfaces to the 
Macintosh and Windows operating systems. The dark to light gradient of the OS X 
icons being an obvious reference. Again this can be seen as drawing on a 
familiar paradigm to minimise potential barriers between the user and content.

[1] A List Apart < http://www.alistapart.com >
[2] Web standards checklist < 
http://www.maxdesign.com.au/presentation/checklist.cfm >

Cheers,

-- 
Andy Kirkwood | Creative Director

Motive | web.design.integrity
http://www.motive.co.nz
ph: (04) 3 800 800  fx: (04) 970 9693
mob: 021 369 693
93 Rintoul St, Newtown
PO Box 7150, Wellington South, New Zealand
******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************

Reply via email to