OK, these are as ready for eyes other than mine. I am especially
interested in two things:
1. general response to the two sites particularly how they fare in
the IE family
2. suggestions for readings or websites for HIST 697-History & New
Media.
It might be useful to have two additional pieces of info: I'm a
historian by training but self-taught in web design, and HIST 697 is
a required class for doctoral history students who range from the
absolutely petrified to those who have built sites with tables. My
job is to move them in 14 weeks to standards-based, accessible websites.
Both the XHTML and CSS validates.
Base site:
http://www.archiva.net/
http://www.archiva.net/screen.css
HIST 697:
http://www.archiva.net/hist697ay06/
http://www.archiva.net/hist697ay06/hist697ay06_screen.css
If you have an extra moment, please take a look at HIST 300. I rather
like my horse and wonder if it's effective.
HIST 300:
http://www.archiva.net/hist300ay06/index.html
Finally, I thank the folks on the list who have helped me get this
far on the semantic syllabus.
Best,
Paula
----------------
Paula Petrik
Professor
Department of History & Art History
Associate Director
Center for History & New Media
George Mason University
http://www.archiva.net
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
