Re: [WSG] XHTML again - was:[Claiming compliance when a site doesn't' actually comply]

[Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)]

----- Messaggio originale -----
    Da: "Patrick H. Lauke"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    Inviato: 06/01/06 16.54.27
    A: "wsg@webstandardsgroup.org"<wsg@webstandardsgroup.org>
    Oggetto: Re: [WSG] XHTML again - was:[Claiming compliance when a site 
doesn't' actually comply]
    
    Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) wrote:
    
    >     Roberto:
    >     You miss the css stylesheets as xml. Try this page for see the 
difference in the source code: http://www.fruibile.it
    
    What's the point of defining the stylesheet both with the xml-stylesheet 
    instruction AND the (valid, and clearly defined in XHTML 1.1) link 
    element? As far as I was aware, both methods are just as acceptable.

Roberto:
Yes, but this is suggested by xhtml 1.1 spec.
    
Patrick:
    Additionally: what's the purpose of the conditional comment in this case?
    
    <?xml-stylesheet charset="utf-8" href="/css.asp?cssid=1&amp;csstype=1" 
    type="text/css" media="all" alternate="no" ?>
    <!--[if IE]>
    <?xml-stylesheet charset="utf-8" href="/css.asp?cssid=1&amp;csstype=1" 
    type="text/css" media="all" alternate="no" ?>
    <![endif]-->
    
Roberto:
Read it as "For future ie releases" or "a bug that i need to fix" ;)

******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************