----- Messaggio originale ----- Da: "Patrick H. Lauke"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Inviato: 06/01/06 16.54.27 A: "wsg@webstandardsgroup.org"<wsg@webstandardsgroup.org> Oggetto: Re: [WSG] XHTML again - was:[Claiming compliance when a site doesn't' actually comply] Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) wrote: > Roberto: > You miss the css stylesheets as xml. Try this page for see the difference in the source code: http://www.fruibile.it What's the point of defining the stylesheet both with the xml-stylesheet instruction AND the (valid, and clearly defined in XHTML 1.1) link element? As far as I was aware, both methods are just as acceptable.
Roberto: Yes, but this is suggested by xhtml 1.1 spec. Patrick: Additionally: what's the purpose of the conditional comment in this case? <?xml-stylesheet charset="utf-8" href="/css.asp?cssid=1&csstype=1" type="text/css" media="all" alternate="no" ?> <!--[if IE]> <?xml-stylesheet charset="utf-8" href="/css.asp?cssid=1&csstype=1" type="text/css" media="all" alternate="no" ?> <![endif]--> Roberto: Read it as "For future ie releases" or "a bug that i need to fix" ;) ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************