> try  - textpattern :)  it's easy to use and good.
 
OK, I think this is not a list to discuss such stuff. Nevertheless:
Textpattern is good, very good. But from my view this is a blogger system and not a real cms. This makes it diferent ...


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marko Mihelcic - founder of mcville.net (http.//www.mcville.net)|(http://board.mcville.net)
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 5:59 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] what cms system



2006/1/18, Dietmar Albers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:



                Drupal                  -> ok

fine

                Geeklog                 -> mhhh

mhmh

                Mambo Open Source               -> mhhh

mhmh

                PHP-Nuke                        -> mhhh

mhmm

                phpWCMS                 -> mhhh

mhmm dunno

                phpWebSite                      -> mhhh

nah

                Post-Nuke                       -> mhhh

maybe but nah

                Siteframe                       -> mhhh

aAaaa nah

                TYPO3                           -> very good, but needs some

nope

special webserver options
                Xoops                           -> mhhh

maybe yeah


try  - textpattern :)  it's easy to use and good.

There is one more, very good and easy to understand: Contenido
(http://www.contenido.org/opensourcecms/en/index-b-11-155.html), but there are
not very much special tools and add ons. I'm uisng it for my new school website
(http://hswasserbank.de/da/cms/front_content.php - under construction yet). Btw:
there are some problems with this inline editor, it generates non validating
code and you need to use the java editor and clean up the code before saving it.
You will see! ;-)

Cu
D.


******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************


Reply via email to