> try -
textpattern :) it's easy to use and good.
OK, I
think this is not a list to discuss such stuff.
Nevertheless:
Textpattern is good, very good. But from
my view this is a blogger system and not a real cms. This makes it diferent
...
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marko Mihelcic - founder of mcville.net (http.//www.mcville.net)|(http://board.mcville.net)
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 5:59 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] what cms system
2006/1/18, Dietmar Albers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
fine
mhmh
mhmh
mhmm
mhmm dunno
nah
maybe but nah
aAaaa nah
nope
maybe yeah
try - textpattern :) it's easy to use and good.
Drupal -> ok
fine
Geeklog -> mhhh
mhmh
Mambo Open Source -> mhhh
mhmh
PHP-Nuke -> mhhh
mhmm
phpWCMS -> mhhh
mhmm dunno
phpWebSite -> mhhh
nah
Post-Nuke -> mhhh
maybe but nah
Siteframe -> mhhh
aAaaa nah
TYPO3 -> very good, but needs some
nope
special webserver options
Xoops -> mhhh
maybe yeah
try - textpattern :) it's easy to use and good.
There is one more, very good and easy to understand: Contenido
(http://www.contenido.org/opensourcecms/en/index-b-11-155.html), but there are
not very much special tools and add ons. I'm uisng it for my new school website
(http://hswasserbank.de/da/cms/front_content.php - under construction yet). Btw:
there are some problems with this inline editor, it generates non validating
code and you need to use the java editor and clean up the code before saving it.
You will see! ;-)
Cu
D.
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************