Re: [WSG] Gaps At The Top - ANSWER

[Stephen Stagg]

Without wanting to unleash too many ponies, I would be interested to know why using 0(px | em | %) is so much of a standards blunder.  I'm sure there some obvious answer but for the life of me, I can't think of one :). If this has already been done to death on the list, please forgive me and email me privately in reply. I shall of course not use units when specifying 0 as a length in future CSS work. Thanks in Advance Stephen. On 3 Feb 2006, at 16:29, White Ash wrote: Thanks Georg for the fix ~ I must remember that for future designs!   That works beautifully.   And Russ ~ so that more and more web standards faeries may live, I have converted all 0px's in my code to 0.   I do believe....   White Ash   FIX:   Re: [WSG] Gaps At The Top Gunlaug Sørtun Thu, 02 Feb 2006 15:32:25 -0800     Adding something like: div#container,div#banner {padding-top: 1px;} #navlist {margin-top: 10px;} h1 {margin-top: -10px; max-width: 400px;} ...shouldn't be too far off. Those padding-top prevent collapsing margins, and the margins are then defined to position correctly across browser-land. Adjust those margins to taste, and check for unwanted overlapping/breaking when font-resizing is applied. regards Georg -- http://www.gunlaug.no