Terrence Wood wrote: >> a marketing-oriented person would probably eat you for lunch > I doubt it. I spent over a decade in marketing =) > > Besides, a solution for getting topics above the fold has already been > discussed in this thread.
Which one are you referring to? A "serie of anchor links at the top of the page that jump down to the required content."? AFAIK, it has been mentionned but not "discussed"; and FWIW, I don't think it is better in term of usability/accessibility, and what about semantic? I believe the document is more coherent with the answers following the questions rather than split in 2 groups,: the questions, the answers. Which brings a "out of context" issue that doesn't exist with a Definition List. And since we're talking about "browser feature", what about printing the page? ;) Regards, Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
