As someone else has already said, they are only warnings. However, if
you are pushing standards to clients and they view the results, it is a
good idea to have no warnings or errors. Best way around this I have
found is to use background-color: inherit; and the warning will be removed.
Regards,
Ric
Soeren Mordhorst wrote:
I feel good when a validation-program could not find any failures,
cause it gives me a secure feeling that at least the basics of
standards are complied.
But how important is the validation with tools like hera or the
w3c-validators realy?
Let's take an example:
After a CSS-validation made by w3c there appears the result:"You have
no background-color with your color : h1".
In this case my question would be: Why should I define a
background-color, if the background-color
that should be used is already defined in the body-element?
All the best,
Soeren
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
