Regarding "Why beat your head against the wall of buggy browsers when the 
manufacturer themselves supplies a workaround?"

I want to know more about conditional comments.  Is this a good resource?
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms537512.aspx#Conditional_Statement
s


Joyce

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Nick Gleitzman
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 3:28 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Footer Problem IE5.x


On 2 Jul 2007, at 6:09 PM, Sarah Peeke (XERT) wrote:

> I guess I was hoping to fix the problem(s), rather than just rely on a
> hack. Other suggestions appreciated.

Fair enough, but I'd say your chances of getting the one set of css 
rules to display correctly in all browsers are pretty slim - especially 
if you want to include browsers as flawed as Exploder 5.x. Even MS 
themselves accept how hard this is - hence CCs.

I routinely serve as many as three alternative stylesheets vis CCs for 
different versions of IE. They only need to contain a handful of rules 
necessary to override the correct values served to compliant browsers.

Whether you consider CCs a hack is, I guess, subjective. But your code 
will validate, and they're easy to remove with a global search and 
replace if and when the time comes that you don't need them any more.

Why beat your head against the wall of buggy browsers when the 
manufacturer themselves supplies a workaround?

N
___________________________
omnivision. websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/



*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************





*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************

Reply via email to