On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:06 PM, Hassan Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > One argument against the use of transitional doctypes is that they're > > now more than eight years old which makes them about half as old as > > the Web itself. Do you want to base your site on what was status quo > > half a Web lifetime ago? > > > > Uh, aren't the transitional doctypes pretty much, er, well, exactly, > as old as their corresponding strict doctypes? :-)
True enough! I said that was a potential argument; I didn't say it was a *good* argument. =) In all seriousness, it sounds like the OP's boss is unconvinced by rational arguments, so why not try some irrational ones? -- Philip http://NikitaTheSpider.com/ Whole-site HTML validation, link checking and more ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
