You'd think AGIMO would validate their pages wouldn't you?
 
Phil

        -----Original Message-----
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Vickery
        Sent: Monday, 18 August 2008 10:41 AM
        To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
        Subject: RE: [WSG] Lawsuits for inaccessible websites
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]



        The AGIMO guidelines specify minimum A, preferably AA.

        http://webpublishing.agimo.gov.au/Accessibility

         

         

        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Boyd
        Sent: Monday, 18 August 2008 8:58 AM
        To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
        Subject: Re: [WSG] Lawsuits for inaccessible websites

         

         

        On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 12:18 AM, tee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

        Thanks for the info, Elizabeth.

        Aussie members in this list  must be very proud of this law :-)
Let's just hope no gold-digger lawyer sees an opportunity there!

        Is the requirement for this law higher per WCAG guidelines (A,
AA, or AAA)? For example, Section 508 is really low standard in my
opinion.

        tee


        Tee,

        the Disability Discrimination Act (here in Oz) does not actually
specify the level of compliance according to WCAG. HREOC and AGIMO
(google these) make some interpretations of the Act that are again
interpreted by individual government bodies - I think it is fair to say
that accessibility standards in Australia aren't (standard).

        Cheers, Andrew  
         

        -- 
        ---
        Andrew Boyd
        http://onblogging.com.au



*******************************************************************
        List Guidelines:
http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
        Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
        Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

*******************************************************************



***********************************************************************
        WARNING: The information contained in this email may be
confidential.
        If you are not the intended recipient, any use or copying of any
part
        of this information is unauthorised. If you have received this
email in
        error, we apologise for any inconvenience and request that you
notify
        the sender immediately and delete all copies of this email,
together
        with any attachments.

*********************************************************************** 



*******************************************************************
        List Guidelines:
http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
        Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
        Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

******************************************************************* 



*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************

Reply via email to