Hi Jason, Why don't you turn the convincing angle up-side-down? Instead of pulling the 'accessibility' pitch focus on the performance and customizability of having a CSS-driven navigation (accessibility will follow naturally).
Perhaps you could prepare two versions of a similar looking navigation (one image one css) and run a performance test. Show the results and hopefully convince your client to choose wisely? Only a thought. Rob 2008/8/27 Jason Pruim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Good Morning everyone! > > I have a client that wants me to write his navigation mostly as a picture > and then use image maps to get to the actual links. > > I am wondering, how would I go about convincing my client that this isn't > the best way to do it? I personally think that some nice text links, styled > properly with CSS would look just as good if not better then image maps. > > Oh, and to put it into context, it's a picture rating site so I don't know > that Blind users are going to be too much of a concern for him since they > can't see what the main part of the site is for. > > Any info I could get about this would be wonderful! > > Thanks everyone! > > -- > > Jason Pruim > Raoset Inc. > Technology Manager > MQC Specialist > 11287 James St > Holland, MI 49424 > www.raoset.com > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > ******************************************************************* > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm > Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ******************************************************************* > > -- / Rob Enslin / enslin.co.uk / twitter.com/robenslin / +44759 052 8890 ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************