> Could someone tell me if the following use of rel and rev are semantically > accurate? > > > > <a href="#tandc" rev="appendix">T&Cs</a> > > ... > > <div id="tandc"> ... </div> > > > > > > <a href="tandc.html" rel="appendix">T&Cs</a> > > > > > > I'm currently developing a pop-up method specifically for Terms & > Conditions. > > One where the T&Cs are in a div at the bottom of the page and a second > where an Ajax call fetches the external content. > > > > > > Thanks for reading > > > > Mike Foskett > > http://webSemantics.co.uk/ >
Since there are no "standard" values for rel, I think that microformats have been using this for licensing, and probably others. It's the relationship of the link, and if the link is a type of appendix, then semantically I don't see anything wrong with your use, though I would add a title tag stating the link was going to open a pop-up, if that's the case. rev is also a relationship, but not of the linked item, the other way around. If I was on a table of measurments and there was a link back to the recipe, the link would have a rev defining that the measurments do you're on is a dictionary for the recipe. So I don't think your use of rev is correct, or semantic. If you were on the T&C and had a link to the home page, this link could have a rev. at least that's the way I understand it. -- Susan R. Grossman [EMAIL PROTECTED] ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
