yes, good point.
I was making a subtle stab at the .htm versus .html discussion in here
recently.
but given my 'druthers, yes, I'd personally drop all file extensions
in URLs completely if I could.
Joe
On 05/11/2008, at 4:04 PM, Hassan Schroeder wrote:
Joe Ortenzi wrote:
the long and friendly URL is really for the final page, which
should not bury a full product list so deeply and should be titled /
product_list.html anyway.
Uh, how about more properly '/product_list' (or '/product-list') --
your customers don't care about the underlying '.xyz' technology, and
`Cool URIs don't change` <http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI>, or
so I've heard. :-)
--
Hassan Schroeder ----------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Webtuitive Design === (+1) 408-621-3445 === http://webtuitive.com
dream. code.
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
================================
Joseph Ortenzi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+61 (0)434 047 804
http://www.typingthevoid.com
http://twitter.com/wheelyweb
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jortenzi
Skype:wheelyweb
http://au.movember.com/mospace/1714401
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
