I have somemore invites to give.

yara...@googlewave.com

On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 5:51 AM, Duncan Hill <dun...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:04:52 -0000, Krystian Szastok <sunl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>  I think it's a great idea.
>>
>> Problem is that wave is for group projects, so really, if we wanted to
>> roll it out we'd need to start creating some kind of community
>> projects I guess...
>>
>> But I do definitely want to participate.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Krystian
>>
>>  I'm still just feeling my way in Wave, but it seems that it can be
> one-to-one as easily as it can group involvement.
>
> There is of course the risk that main-line topics get handled in a Wave and
> that could exclude any list members that have not signed up, or do not have
> the facility to use Wave.
> It would probably also not show up in the list archives and I know from
> personal experience that I have had many of my own queries answered with a
> simple archive search.
>
> Perhaps an idea to start is to add our 'Wave' address to our signature.
>
> Duncan
> dun...@googlewave.com
>
>
>
> *******************************************************************
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
> *******************************************************************
>
>


*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
*******************************************************************

Reply via email to