Guys, Shouldn't this be a separate thread? Thx Pete
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Rimantas Liubertas <riman...@gmail.com>wrote: > > It obviously worked in provoking discussion. > > Where do you see discussion there? Does "keep them coming" count as one? > I am all for "them coming" but I'd like some QA applied to them too. > > > (And I reserve the right to keep my opinion about the original commenter > to > > myself ;-) > > Don't be shy. I will stick to my right (I hope I have one) to call BS > when I see it. > Just as I did five years ago when Vlad was pushing similar FUD about HTML > on this same list. Now seems like he has a new target. > > > "Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds > > discuss people." > > - Eleanor Roosevelt > > I was discussing the quality of the posts on rebuildingtheweb.com. I > still think that > this groups deserves better than writings of the guy who calls end > tags "elements" > and thinks that missing end tags for html and body elements in HTML4 is > invalid > markup. > Seems Russ and you opted to discuss me instead. Do you think that quote > still applies? > > > Regards, > Rimantas > -- > http://rimantas.com/ > > > ******************************************************************* > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm > Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org > ******************************************************************* > > -- -- Peter Costello +61 437 673 901 http://www.petercostello.co.uk ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org *******************************************************************
