> Hi Kerry. Neither the blind user or I
> were suggesting that alternatives were not a good idea, or
> even a requirement. I'd always recommend providing an HTML
> alternative if possible along with accessible (tagged) PDF.
> The question was about Word as as a viable alternative to
> PDF. I am not sure it is. Though others may disagree!
I agree to the fact that HTML approach is the best. I normally use Google docs
they can open any documents - pdfs, word, excel, images etc like any other html
document. See the link:
<https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B1iqp0kGPjWsZjA2MTFmMTQtM2ZmYS00OWU2LWI4NjMtMzEyMjYwMjYzOGI3&hl=en>
It is just a sample page I have created for demonstration purposes with
inadvertent typos!. It is just a simple pdf file but displayed in your browser
and requires no plugs of any kind.
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
*******************************************************************