Very Neat.
On May 26, 2012, at 4:44 PM, Justin Avery wrote: > > Trent Walton originally wrote about it with his article, , before Jordan > Moore expanded on the idea with > http://www.jordanm.co.uk/post/21863299677/building-with-content-choreography > and was even nice enough to produce us a workable demo, > http://www.jordanm.co.uk/contentchoreography and explains further > http://www.jordanm.co.uk/contentchoreographydemo. In the demo, navigation in the source code is still sitting below the header section when the screen is at 480px and below. How does this work for AT (VoiceOver for example) though if I want the navigation stay "below the fold"? I don't supposed the AT is smart enough to do what I want if I don't place the navigation code at the bottom section of the page. tee > > On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 3:57 PM, <wsg@webstandardsgroup.org> wrote > > > From: tee <weblis...@gmail.com> > Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 14:14:10 -0700 > Subject: Re: [WSG] Media queries and roles > > Don't know the answer for sure, but if you display none or make it > invisible AT would ignore it no? My logic is, display:none & invisible > should precede ARIA elements. If a site speficically told the AT not to > display a block of content, it shouldn't bother to annouce the role(s) > within it to confuse user. > > When doing RWD instead of mobile adaptation, that navigation goes to > the bottom of the page for the consideration of Mobile version, my > approach is to use absolute position to target the desktop version's > navigation instead of making duplication. > > tee > > > On May 24, 2012, at 1:12 PM, Tom Livingston wrote: > > > List, > > > > We have a project being worked on that is being done using RWD. For > > mobile, we are repeating the nav at the bottom of the page and > > showing/hiding - with display: block/none; - the appropriate navbar > > based on min-width media queries. > > > > My question is if the desktop main nav has a role of 'navigation', > > should the mobile nav at the bottom have that same role? Will that > > mess up screen readers et al? > > > > TIA > > > > -- > > ********************************************************************* > From: Tom Livingston <tom...@gmail.com> > Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 08:44:14 -0400 > Subject: Re: [WSG] Media queries and roles > > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 5:14 PM, tee <weblis...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Don't know the answer for sure, but if you display none or make it invisi > ble AT would ignore it no? My logic is, display:none & invisible should pre > cede ARIA elements. If a site speficically told the AT not to display a blo > ck of content, it shouldn't bother to annouce the role(s) within it to conf > use user. > > > > When doing RWD instead of mobile adaptation, that navigation goes to t > he bottom of the page for the consideration of Mobile version, my approach > is to use absolute position to target the desktop version's navigation inst > ead of making duplication. > > > > tee > > > > > > On May 24, 2012, at 1:12 PM, Tom Livingston wrote: > > > >> List, > >> > > Thanks tee. My thoughts as well, but wasn't sure. > > Also, I thought of absolute pos., but I do not think the structure I > need will work with that. > > Thanks again > > -- > > ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org *******************************************************************
