Hi John, I’ve compiled (and am running) 1.4 Rev 4204 under OSX 10.9.4 with Qt 5.3.1. Granted, one successful installation is hardly conclusive, however, I have done it.
Scott D. Hernalsteen/W8CQD FCC Licensed Amateur Radio Operator (Amateur Extra Class) www.w8cqd.com "To preserve liberty it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them..." - 1788 Richard Henry Lee On Sep 11, 2014, at 14:40, John Nelson <j...@rmnjmn.demon.co.uk> wrote: > Hi Bill and Joe, > > 1) What version of Qt are you compiling against? Qt5.2.1? I compiled > a local version of Qt5.2.1 from source following your suggestion to be able > to get full c++11 support. But qt-project now has 5.3.1 available. Have > you (or anyone) used this and should we incorporate 5.3.1 in the beta > version? Will it be necessary to compile from source again? > > 2) Your new hamlib is "imminent". I'll wait for this before testing a Mac > version on OSX 10.9.4. > > --- John G4KLA > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Want excitement? > Manually upgrade your production database. > When you want reliability, choose Perforce > Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want excitement? Manually upgrade your production database. When you want reliability, choose Perforce Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
