Michael Black <mdblack98@...> writes:
**** Hi Mike: > > Doesn't the "Flatten" box do that for you? **** No. "Flatten" further distorts the spectrum display rather than smoothing the baseline. > > I'm looking here right now at a JT9 signal with side lobes that has an 11dB > peak and -25dB on the side lobes which I can see on the Cumulative graph. > So that's a 36dB difference visible and it has all the appearance of being > clamped. **** In my case - in a signal rich environment - a JT65 signal at -01 will not only "shoot up" from the baseline, but will depress the baseline down making weak signals not appear in the waterfall, though they will appear as pips on the spectrum display's trace. > > Are you looking for more amplitude on the low level signals? So doing > another non-linear scaling would amplify the lower signal levels? > **** I'm looking to see the weak signals appear on the waterfall display. They appear on the spectrum display, but a very strong signal will depress the entire spectrum display trace to a level below the threshold for appearing on the waterfall. As is, the spectrum display provides a faithful representation of the audio bandpass from the sound card. I'd rather have an indicator of the presence of weak signals on both the spectrum and waterfall displays. > Mike W9MDB > **** 73 de Paul DU2/WA8UGN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
