Joe, > I'm thinking about the possible implications of our choice of values for > bias and maxcycles, and also about Edson's suggestion to not send > reception reports to WSPRnet until the second decode of a given > callsign. I might have more to say about it in a day or so. >
I think that John, K5XL reported some interesting and pertinent data here: http://wsprnet.org/drupal/comment/13880#comment-13880 He clearly detected the change to a more aggressive bias. His rate of 40 or so out of 60000 is about 7x10^-4 - a factor of 3 or 4 smaller than the -31dB SNR simulation for the pre-fano-fix case, which was 25/1000 or 2.5e-3. (I am defining P_bad_decode as number of bad decodes divided by total number of decodes.) John was using version r5499 which I think is the compiled version that you released for windows. That was before signal subtraction. It is possible that subtraction will change the statistics, but I’d be surprised if P_bad_decode changes by much. Steve k9an > -- Joe > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
