Hi Rex,
Thanks for the suggestion. As it happens, we're working only with JT65A
up to now. I'm well aware that the B and C submodes in WSJT-X are well
below par in sensitivity. No work has been done on them yet, beyond
putting most of the basic essentials in place. In due course, I expect
that sensitivity in WSJT-X for all submodes will be at least as good as
in WSJT10.
-- Joe, K1JT
On 10/16/2015 5:47 PM, Rex Moncur wrote:
> Hi Joe
>
> In case it helps in looking for the differences between WSJT and WSJT-X it
> might be worth looking at what happens on JT65c. You might recall I found
> that the reduction in performance on WSJT-X compared to WSJT10 for
> convolutional decoding was only about 1 dB on JT65a about 6 dB on JT65b and
> about 11 dB on JT65c.
>
> Rex VK7MO
>
>
>
>
> I will spend some time looking at differences in the way WSJT and WSJT-X are
> currently doing the time-and-frequency synchronization.
>
> -- Joe, K1JT
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
