Hi Rex, Thanks for the suggestion. As it happens, we're working only with JT65A up to now. I'm well aware that the B and C submodes in WSJT-X are well below par in sensitivity. No work has been done on them yet, beyond putting most of the basic essentials in place. In due course, I expect that sensitivity in WSJT-X for all submodes will be at least as good as in WSJT10.
-- Joe, K1JT On 10/16/2015 5:47 PM, Rex Moncur wrote: > Hi Joe > > In case it helps in looking for the differences between WSJT and WSJT-X it > might be worth looking at what happens on JT65c. You might recall I found > that the reduction in performance on WSJT-X compared to WSJT10 for > convolutional decoding was only about 1 dB on JT65a about 6 dB on JT65b and > about 11 dB on JT65c. > > Rex VK7MO > > > > > I will spend some time looking at differences in the way WSJT and WSJT-X are > currently doing the time-and-frequency synchronization. > > -- Joe, K1JT > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel