Hi Mike,
On 10/19/2015 2:22 PM, Michael Black wrote:
> Consideration of this trivial patch to allow RRR to trigger the logging
> dialog box would be much appreciated.
Obviously you're welcome to modify the behavior of your own builds of
the programs according to your own wishes.
There's a lot of history (about 15 years of it) of behind the standard
program behavior, and good reasons why it should remain as it is.
In particular, concerning your suggested change: purists will say that a
contact is not complete just because you send RRR. The QSO is complete
when your QSO partner *receives* your RRR, and you should not log it
until you are persuaded this has happened.
All EME operators are "purists" in the sense that this word was used
above. Of course, you can click "Log QSO" whenever you are happy that a
QSO has been made.
-- 73, Joe, K1JT
> Index: mainwindow.cpp
> @@ -72,7 +73,7 @@
> bool message_is_73 (int type, QStringList const& msg_parts)
> {
> return type>= 0
> -&& ((type< 6&& msg_parts.contains ("73"))
> +&& ((type< 6&& (msg_parts.contains ("73") ||
> msg_parts.contains("RRR")))
> || (type == 6&& !msg_parts.filter ("73").isEmpty ()));
> }
> }
>
> Mike W9MDB
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
