We've gone through this discussion before...I used to think it was a good idea too. But...RR73 is a grid location...and RRR is the last message for the CQ side of the QSO...not 73. So you don't save any time by doing RR73 unless you would otherwise do an RRR followed by an unnecessary 73. It's just hard to drop the habit of using 73 like you use on every other protocol.
RRR :-) Mike W9MDB <https://www.avast.com/lp-safe-emailing?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/lp-safe-emailing?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> <#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 5:53 AM, James Shaver (N2ADV) <n2...@windstream.net> wrote: > I would second Igor's request especially since cutting the additional time > has come in handy during changing HF conditions where the band could drop > out quickly during a QSO. It may also have the secondary effect of > eliminating some of the angst exhibited by some operators out there that > I'm sure we've all seen in one place or another on the various social media > platforms if it's included as an "official" part of the software. > > 73, > > Jim S. > N2ADV > > > On Dec 11, 2015, at 4:15 AM, Игорь Ч <c_i...@inbox.ru> wrote: > > > > Hi Joe and all, > > > > I have checked statistics based on the All.txt file: at least every > second operator transmit manually generated message RR73 or 'RRR 73' > instead of the standard RRR message. File with the summary and raw data in > MS Excel format is located there: > https://cloud.mail.ru/public/4KBg/UoqJWw6rK > > > > Summary does not include scenario where some operators use 73 message > instead of the RRR one. > > > > There are three reasons to modify user interface with this message: > > > > 1. It should reduce spectrum usage and interference on the overcrowded > HF bands > > 2. It will make GUI more user friendly one > > 3. It will save time, both, in terms of the QSO length and manual > message generation > > > > Also possibility to activate prompt for QSO logging on the RR73 message > would benefit users. > > > > May I ask to consider the code change in some future release, please? > > > > 73 Igor UA3DJY > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > > wsjt-devel mailing list > > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
