On 15/12/2015 03:21, Steven Franke wrote: > Alas, I’m getting some significantly different results for Rayleigh fading > cases now, so it may be that something is not yet right. Or, perhaps > something was not right before. Either way, it will take some time to track > down. I will report back when I get it figured out. Hi Steve, Joe and All,
I have made some changes to jt65sim's command line parsing. Apologies if you have scripts that drive this tool but the changes required should be small. Use 'jt65sim -h' for details. I have added a '-p' switch which disables all PRNG seeding so that absolutely repeatable simulations may be run if required. I have also added some sensible, to me at least, default argument values. I have also added building of jt65 to the CMake build script since I'm sure it is in use at present with all the work on JT65 decoding. Further to a comment by Steve in a previous message; when you build targets with the CMake generated makefiles, you can usually run or debug those targets directly in the build tree. There's no need to install oir manually move the executables to an install directory. The programs wsjtx and jt9 are exceptions to this rule since they need some other infrastructure that is only created by installing them. I will try and remove this last constraint as I believe that is now possible with the better control of writeable locations and not having to communicate with KVASD any more. With respect to Steve's issue above, I think that the only difference is that before my changes the Fortran RANDOM_NUMBER PRNG was not being seeded whereas now it is. Could this be the source of the differences you are seeing? If so the new '-p' switch on jt65sim may be helpful in diagnosing this issue. 73 Bill G4WJS. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
