Hi Edson,
Thanks for your message -- and HNY! I'm happy to hear that you, too,
find the new decoders to be performing very well.
As for the QEX article: it's already somewhat more that half done, in
draft form. :-) We'll be happy to send you an advance copy when it's done.
-- Joe
On 1/1/2016 1:33 PM, Edson W. R. Pereira wrote:
> Joe and Frank,
>
> Happy New Year!
>
> For the last few days I have been monitoring the JT65, JT9 and WSPR
> activity on 15m and am observing that the performance enhancements in the
> decoders are very impressive. Not only in speed, but also in sensitivity
> and ability to dig signals from the noise or in-band QRM.
>
> A sincere thank you to both of you. This is amateur radio at it's best.
>
> Please consider, time permitting, a QEX article. This type of technology
> milestone deserves to be published.
>
> 73, Edson PY2SDR
>
>
>
>
> ---
> - We humans have the capability to do amazing things if we work together.
> - Nós seres humanos temos a capacidade de fazer coisas incríveis se
> trabalharmos juntos.
>
> On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Joe Taylor<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Steve,
>>
>> On 1/1/2016 11:25 AM, Steven Franke wrote:
>>> All-in-all - across-the-board improvements are evident and, based on my
>> test
>>> results, r6330 has the best jt65a decoder performance of any version
>> that we
>>> have produced to date.
>>
>> Thanks for sharing your latest test results. They're fully consistent
>> with mine.
>>
>> Others should know: Steve is too kind with his attributions of credit.
>> None of these improvements would have happened without Steve's critical
>> insights about a way to implement a soft-decision Reed Solomon decoder,
>> and most importantly, a way to assign symbol erasure probabilities in
>> the algorithm's inner loop.
>>
>> I think we're very close to an appropriate "let's ship it" stage for
>> the latest-and-greatest JT65 decoder.
>>
>> -- Joe, K1JT
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> wsjt-devel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
