Hi all,

I totally agree with Bill ND0B. Here in EU  50276 is crazy, with a lot of
EU-EU QSOs during multihop openings, 99% JT65A, very few JT9 slow.
A JT65 DX window will help, imho.

On 50280 to 50292 more and more JT9 fast activity, a very good thing, so
moving MSK144 to 50260 will help.
Regarding the multi-decode for JT9 fast, I also agree, though I have a JT9E
fast sample where 3 different decodes occured, 2 from the same call +
another one (@950Hz and @575 Hz).
An option to have the vertical waterfall for fast modes would help
spreading inside the band.

Thank you for reading,

73 Ady YO2NAA



On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Bill ND0B <n...@ockert.us> wrote:

> Good morning,
>
>
>
> With the onset of 6m Es season a couple of things have happened that lead
> to a couple of suggestions:
>
>
>
>    1. The existing MSK144 calling frequency of 50.280 was found to be in
>    too close proximity to the JT modes.   It was discussed and decided that,
>    with the near total replacement of FSK441 it made sense to move to
>    50.260.   That move is pretty much complete with only an occasional call /
>    contact occurring on the old frequency.   Would it be possible to change
>    the MSK144 default frequency that WSJTx ships with to 50.260?
>    2. The JT mode are REALLY taking off this summer with unprecedented
>    levels of activity on JT65.   This is fantastic and is leading to some
>    incredible contacts however it is also somewhat of a disappointment as JT9
>    fast modes are likely superior for this effort.   Monitoring ON4KST chat
>    room yesterday there was a discussion of this and one of the things brought
>    up that is stifling the adoption of JT9 fast modes is the lack of
>    multi-decode for them.   That is a very good point and considering some of
>    the comments about JT65 activity (some folks have reported over 20 decodes
>    at once) this is a limitation that will keep JT9 fast modes from being
>    adopted.    Would it be possible to enable muti-decodes for the JT9 fast
>    mode?
>
>
>
> Thank you in advance for any consideration these thought might garner.
>
>
>
> 73 de Bill ND0B
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to