We probably need a warning if the Tx 5 message will not be recognized as a
final message in auto sequence.Which right now means it doesn't contain a 73.
de Mike W9MDB
From: Neil Zampella <ne...@techie.com>
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 9:50 AM
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 and "Call 1st"
The problem with that is, the person calling CQ on the other end has a
program expecting to find a 73. That said ... why would you need to? If
its to say something like 'Lotw eqsl tu', well that breaks the autoseq on the
other side, but they can find that out now with a QRZ lookup !!
On 7/12/2017 7:41 AM, Gordon Higgins wrote:
to send free text u nead to remove auto seq this works ok thanks
On 12 July 2017 at 12:38, Gordon Higgins <g3pxt1...@gmail.com> wrote:
? why in auto seqence will it not send free text tx5 ft8 ?
On 12 July 2017 at 12:15, James Shaver (N2ADV) <n2...@windstream.net> wrote:
That's built into the wetware (brain matter) of the person controlling the
program :)
> On Jul 11, 2017, at 10:22 PM, Ross Primrose <n...@n4rp.com> wrote:
>
> One feature I'd like to see is if you answer a CQ, and the station comes
> back to someone else, halt tx...
>
> 73, Ross N4RP
>
>> On 07/11/2017 07:23 PM, Ricky Scott W7PSK wrote:
>> As Jim said, its a nice AID to us old timers that cant click the red in 1
>> second
>>
>> ------ Original Message ------
>> From: "Jim - N4ST" <newsgr...@jimpricejr.com>
>> To: "'WSJT software development'" <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge. net>
>> Sent: 7/11/2017 4:07:40 PM
>> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 and "Call 1st"
>>
>>> Please keep "Call 1st". It is a great aid to us old timers.
>>> If people don't like it, don't click the box.
>>>
>>> ____________
>>> 73,
>>> Jim - N4ST
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Erik - [mailto:erikcarl...@live.com]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 12:02
>>> To: WSJT software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge. net>
>>> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 and "Call 1st"
>>>
>>>
>>> "We are interested in feedback from users on the question of partial QSO
>>> automation. Should "Call 1st" be changed or removed?"
>>>
>>> I like it as it is. One thing though, it gets broken by callsigns such as
>>> EA8/G8BCG. When commuted to G8BCG for the QSO, auto sequence stops. Not a
>>> big deal since reciprocal calls such as this one are not too common. My
>>> over-riding request is to not remove "Call 1st".
>>>
>>> Erik EI4KF.
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------ ------------------------------
>>> ----------------
>>> --
>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging
>>> tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>> ______________________________ _________________
>>> wsjt-devel mailing list
>>> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.n et
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/ lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------ ------------------------------
>>> ------------------
>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>> ______________________________ _________________
>>> wsjt-devel mailing list
>>> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.n et
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/ lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------ ------------------------------
>> ------------------
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> ______________________________ _________________
>> wsjt-devel mailing list
>> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.n et
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/ lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>
>
> --
> FCC Section 97.313(a) “At all times, an amateur station must use the minimum
> transmitter power necessary to carry out the desired communications.”
>
>
> ------------------------------ ------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> ______________________________ _________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.n et
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/ lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
------------------------------ ------------------------------
------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
______________________________ _________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.n et
https://lists.sourceforge.net/ lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org!
http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
